Grok 4: Reasoning Breakthrough vs GPT, Claude & Gemini

Grok 4 represents xAI’s biggest step yet toward building a model that doesn’t just generate plausible text, but actually reasons through problems.Launched on July 10, 2025, it integrates live browsing, a code interpreter, long-context support, and an optional multi-agent mode (Heavy) that lets multiple instances collaborate on hard questions before returning a consensus.

For researchers, engineers, and teams working on high-stakes tasks, that combination means:

• Fewer hallucinations when tackling technical work.
• Stronger performance on math, logic, and problem-solving.
• More automation potential through memory and project/task workflows.

Evolution — from Grok-1 to Grok-4

The Grok family has evolved through compute scaling and, with Grok 4, a major paradigm shift in post-training:

• Grok 2: essentially a next-token predictor, following the standard LLM mold.
• Grok 3: scaled pre-training compute by roughly 10× compared to Grok 2, improving raw capability through sheer size.
• Grok 4: does not rely on another giant leap in pre-training tokens. Instead, it keeps pre-training compute on par with Grok 3 but scales post-training reasoning compute by ~10×, focusing on reinforcement and problem-solving.

At the core of this new strategy is Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVW). Instead of training only on text prediction, Grok 4 is fine-tuned intensively on problems with clear, checkable answers (like math and logic). Every time the model reaches the correct answer, it receives a reward. By running this loop at massive scale, xAI encourages Grok 4 to engage in genuine “thinking-like” behavior, leading to dramatic gains in reasoning benchmarks.

Grok 4 vs. Grok 4 Heavy

• Grok 4 (standard): a multimodal model with long context, native tools, and reasonable trade-offs between speed, accuracy, and cost.
• Grok 4 Heavy: a multi-agent configuration where multiple agents pursue different solution strategies in parallel, then consolidate. This boosts accuracy on tasks like Olympiad-level math or ARC-AGI, though it runs slower and costs more.

Think of Heavy as your “high-precision mode”—great for critical queries, less ideal for day-to-day tasks.

Key capabilities

• Native tools: automatic use of browsing, code execution, and file analysis.
• Context window: 128K in the app, 256K via API, supporting long reports, repos, or data collections.
• Memory & tasks: features like “Projects” (persistent context) and “Tasks” (automation hooks) point toward agent-style workflows.
• Multimodal: text + vision, with early progress on camera and voice interaction.

Benchmarks and Comparisons

In the no-tools setting, Grok 4 scores 26.9% on HLE—ahead of other standard models. With tools enabled it jumps to 41.0%, and in the multi-agent ‘Heavy’ configuration it reaches the incredibly 50.7%.

On other academic benchmarks such as GPQA and AIME’25, Grok outperformed most top competitors, with only the recent release of GPT-5 managing to edge it out by a narrow margin on AIME’25.

‍

ARC-AGI Benchmark and Grok 4’s Breakthrough

The ARC-AGI benchmark (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus) is a test designed to measure the adaptive intelligence of AI systems. Unlike traditional benchmarks with large datasets, ARC-AGI presents tasks with only a few examples, requiring the model to infer the underlying pattern—a type of reasoning that comes naturally to humans but has historically been extremely challenging for AI.

In 2024, the benchmark’s creator released ARC-AGI 2, a harder version where most leading models struggled to even reach 10% accuracy. However, Grok 4 achieved 16%, setting a new milestone and demonstrating how modern reasoning models are beginning to close the gap with human-like problem-solving.

‍

The coding model — grok-code-fast-1

On August 28, 2025, xAI launched grok-code-fast-1, an agentic model specialized for development tasks:

• Designed for fast patching, refactoring, and test generation.
• Runs at lower cost and latency than full-size models.
• Fits into IDE/CI pipelines, automating bug fixes and refactor loops.
• Works best in small scopes (module-by-module), paired with verification cycles (tests, diffs, patching).

This makes it a strong candidate for autonomous coding agents where cost and iteration speed matter more than generalist versatility.

How to Access Grok 4

You can access Grok 4 now in three different ways: the X app, the grok.com platform and the xAI API.

Through X (formerly Twitter)

• What you need: An X Premium+ subscription.
• How to access:
  1. Subscribe to Premium+.
  2. Open the X app (mobile or web).
  3. Tap the Grok icon in the navigation bar.
  4. Start chatting with Grok 4 (Premium+ includes it).

If you want even more power, the SuperGrok Heavy plan ($300/month) unlocks Grok 4 Heavy inside X as well.

Through the Web (grok.com)

• What you need: A free xAI account (you can sign in with X, Google, Apple, or email).
• How to access:
  1. Go to grok.com.
  2. Sign in with your chosen account.
  3. If you’re already paying for Premium+ on X, make sure to link your X account: go to Settings → Account → Connect your X Account so that your subscription benefits carry over to grok.com.

Through the xAI API (for developers)

• What you need: An xAI account and an API key.
  
• How to access:
  1. Go to https://x.ai/api and request developer access.
  2. Once approved, you’ll receive an API key and access to docs.

Best-fit use cases

• Research & due diligence: combine live search with citations and in-session code checks.
• STEM & logic-heavy tasks: decompose multi-step reasoning, verify with the interpreter, escalate to Heavy for high-stakes problems.
• Software development: use Grok 4 for audits/refactors and grok-code-fast-1 for automated patching in CI.
• Business modeling: simulate scenarios, challenge assumptions, and consolidate dashboards using browsing + code.

Best practices

1. Break down tasks — align subtasks with tools (browse, code, or standard reasoning).
2. Structure context — even with 256K tokens, summaries, IDs, and tables outperform raw dumps.
3. Use Heavy selectively — reserve for mission-critical queries.
4. Safety first — apply safe prompting, filters, and human review where needed.

Pros & cons

Pros

• Breakthrough reasoning thanks to RLVW post-training and scaled test-time compute.
• Strong performance on hard benchmarks (HLE, GPQA, AIME, ARC-AGI).
• Native tools and long context for complex workflows.
• Developer-focused spinoff (grok-code-fast-1).

Cons

• Heavy mode is slower and more expensive.
• Enterprise safety posture still maturing.
• Multimodal/video capabilities trail some competitors.

Key decision questions

1. Do you need web + code + memory in one session?
2. Do you have ground truths/tests to measure ROI?
3. Can you budget Heavy only for critical accuracy gains?
4. Do you have guardrails (filters, monitoring, human review) in place?

FAQs

Who is Grok 4 for?

Researchers, engineers, and professionals who need deep reasoning plus live information and automation.

What does Grok 4 Heavy add?

Multi-agent reasoning that improves accuracy on the hardest problems, with more latency and cost.

Is it enterprise-ready?

Improved but still requires guardrails, logging, and review for sensitive deployments.

How does it compare to GPT/Claude/Gemini?

Grok 4 leads in reasoning + tool use; GPT shines in ecosystem polish, Claude in safety, Gemini in long-context scale.

Conclusion

Grok 4 is a step-change: not just “bigger pre-training,” but better post-training reasoning through RLVW. With long context, integrated tools, and a multi-agent option, it’s one of the strongest models for complex, high-stakes problem solving today.

If you want to explore how Grok 4 could fit into your workflows, from research automation to agent-driven coding, reach out via the contact form. We’ll prepare a custom pilot plan—including objectives, prompts, guardrails, metrics, and cost estimates—so you can start measuring value within days.

‍